Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
PLoS One ; 18(4): e0283986, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2288030

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Linking routinely collected health care system data records for the same individual across different services and over time has enormous potential for the NHS and its patients. The aims of this data linkage study are to quantify the changes to mental health services utilisation in responses to the COVID-19 pandemic and determine whether these changes were associated with health-related outcomes and wellbeing among people living in the most deprived communities in North East and North Cumbria, England. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will assemble a retrospective cohort of people having referred or self-referred to NHS-funded mental health services or Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services between 23rd March 2019 and 22nd March 2020 in the most deprived areas in England. We will link together data from retrospective routinely collected healthcare data including local general practitioner (GP) practice data, Hospital Episode Statistics admitted patient care outpatients, and A&E, Community Services Data Set, Mental Health Services Data Set, and Improving Access to Psychological Therapies Data Set. We will use these linked patient-level data to 1) describe the characteristics of the cohort prior to the lockdown; 2) investigate changes to mental health services utilised between multiple time periods of the COVID-19 lockdown including out of lockdown; 3) explore the relationship between these changes and health outcomes/wellbeing and factors that confound and mediate this relationship among this cohort. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY: This study comprises a deprived population-based cohort of people having referred or self-referred to NHS-funded secondary mental health services or Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) services over an extended period of the lockdown in England (2019-2022).This study will utilise a new longitudinal data resource that will link together detailed data from a cohort of individual participants and retrospective administrative data relating to the use of primary, secondary, and community care services.The study period covers pre-lockdown, different lockdown and post-lockdown, and out of lockdown periods up to March 2022.Routinely collected administrative data contain limited contextual information and represent an underestimate of total health outcomes for these individuals.Routinely collected datasets can often been incomplete or contain missing data, which can make it difficult to accurately analyse the data and draw meaningful conclusions.Intervention and treatment for mental health conditions are not wholly captured across these data sources and may impact health outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Mental Health Services , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Pandemics , Communicable Disease Control , England/epidemiology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Information Storage and Retrieval
2.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(6)2022 03 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1742462

ABSTRACT

People experiencing homelessness have higher rates of mental ill-health and substance use and lower access to health services compared to the general population. The COVID-19 pandemic led to changes in service delivery across health and social care services, with many adopting virtual or telephone support for service users. This paper explores the experiences of access to community-based mental health and substance use support for people experiencing homelessness during the COVID-19 pandemic. Qualitative telephone interviews were conducted with 10 women and 16 men (ages 25 to 71) who self-identified as experiencing homelessness in North East England between February and May 2021. With five individuals with lived experience, results were analysed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis. Reactive changes to support provision often led to inadvertent exclusion. Barriers to access included: physical locations, repetition of recovery stories, individual readiness, and limited availability. Participants suggested creating services reflective of need and opportunities for choice and empowerment. Community mental health and substance use support for people experiencing homelessness should ensure the support is personalised, responsive to need, inclusive, and trauma-informed. The findings of this research have important implications for mental health and substance use policy and practice for individuals who experience homelessness during a public health crisis.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ill-Housed Persons , Substance-Related Disorders , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Female , Ill-Housed Persons/psychology , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Social Work , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Substance-Related Disorders/psychology
3.
The Lancet ; 398, 2021.
Article in English | ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-1537136

ABSTRACT

Background The UN describes the COVID-19 pandemic as the greatest public health crisis for the current generation. However, individuals who experienced austerity, adversity, and disadvantage prior to the pandemic have been disproportionately affected with every turn the pandemic has taken, from transmission risk to vaccination take-up. One such population is individuals who experience homelessness. As the UK begins to transition to a stage of post-pandemic recovery, it is imperative to understand the perceived impact COVID-19 has had on the day-to-day lives of individuals who experience homelessness, to ensure they are not left behind and recovery planning can be better targeted to their specific needs. Methods Between February and May, 2021, 26 individuals (10 women and 16 men) who self-identified as experiencing homelessness within the Newcastle Gateshead area took part in telephone interviews of 20–80 min in length. Participants provided written or verbal informed consent prior to participating. Recruitment took place through existing networks, housing providers, charities, word of mouth, and snowball sampling. Analysis was co-produced with five individuals with lived experience using interpretative phenomenological analysis. NVivo release 1·5 was used to organise quotes. Ethics approval was granted by the Faculty of Medical Sciences Research Ethics Committee, part of Newcastle University's Research Ethics Committee (ref 2034/6698/2020.) Findings Experiences shared depicted unique stories with commonalities across the findings through five main themes: (1) surreality of day-to-day life—searching for understanding and lost autonomy;(2) an emotional rollercoaster—confronting negative emotions;(3) loneliness is my best friend—learning from being alone;(4) adversity is the only consistency—recognising past and present hardship, violence, and loss;and (5) coping with uncertainty—using drugs, mindfulness, and technology to survive. Interpretation The pandemic has affected the daily lives of people who experience homelessness in a variety of ways, including personal growth, no change, and regression. This study is limited by its localised recruitment in Newcastle and Gateshead in the UK;however, this local focus and involvement of individuals with lived experience has strengthened the study's implications for policy and practice in the region. Initiatives or policies developed to support post-pandemic recovery should reflect the array of impacts, while giving special recognition to loneliness, adversity, and resiliency among individuals who experience homelessness. Funding National Institute for Health Research School for Public Health Research.

4.
J Epidemiol Community Health ; 75(3): 209-212, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-842437

ABSTRACT

This paper reflects concerns that funding and attention should be expanded from the important focus on those suffering and dying from COVID-19, and the safety and resources of healthcare professionals, to address wider questions on the (unequal) health and well-being impacts of COVID-19 and associated response measures. While immediate priorities such as those outlined in the WHO research agenda are undoubtedly important, additional urgent questions must be addressed. These include questions focused on (1) the non-virus impacts of preparing health and social care systems to cope with COVID-19 and (2) the health effects mediated by the educational, economic and social injuries sustained during the pandemic. Long-term, sustained and co-ordinated interdisciplinary research funding will be needed to address the long-lasting impacts of COVID-19 and its response measures.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Planning/organization & administration , Health Policy , Health Services Research/organization & administration , Healthcare Disparities , Pandemics/prevention & control , Adaptation, Psychological , COVID-19/psychology , Health Personnel , Humans , Population Health , Public Health , SARS-CoV-2 , Social Class
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL